just one of those times (in 2003) when I had the blues (briefly)
Your browser does not support the audio element.
đ§ đ” archive.justgoodmusicYour browser does not support the audio element.
đ§ đ” archive.justgoodmusicpeople-first-stories
âThey come for three months - they stay for four years - and I welcome that. Thatâs how we learn. They see us up close and personal and we see them. A lot of countries that they come from have very different governments, with different rules. We get to learn about each without the filter of what they are told. I wouldnât say that when they leave we fully understand each otherâs cultures, but we are surely better off than we would have been if we hadnât.â
âWe bring people in from all over the world, staff and customers. So, why would we treat anyone differently? Them, Us, Staff, Customers, Family ⊠each one of us is part of anotherâs world. And I mean all of us.â
âI donât know much about those large companies you hear about in the news. You could fit our entire community into one of their office blocks. They have their ways. We have ours. So weâre different. Except weâre not. None of us are. They just havenât worked that out yet.â
âTurns out, we have more in common with âforeignersâ - like youâ (he smiles and points his finger at me) âthan some of the people from our own country. Turns out that the ones that are just here to âpartyâ are the odd ones out. Thatâs why we came up with the âSilly Buggerâ rule.â
âIt goes like this. When you come here, you can work and you can party. But thatâs on your time. If you play âsilly buggerâ, there is no second chance. You are out on the next boat. Thatâs how we build and strengthen our community. Everybody is welcome until they make themselves unwelcome.â
âMaybe thatâs something else those big companies could learn from us. If they did, we wouldnât charge. Thatâs another thing - we donât charge to learn - learning makes us all better.â
Travels Without Charley archive.pf.businessâThere is no harm in our criticizing foreigners, if only we would also criticize ourselves. In other words, the world might need even less of its new charity, if it had a little more of the old humility.â
G.K. Chesterton
âDear Junior: Please excuse me for not answering your letter sooner. But I have been so busy not answering letters lately that I have not been able to get around to not answering yours in time. Love, Groucho.â
Groucho Marx
đŹ đ đ observationsAre we winning? Well a whole lot more than we might have been pre-internet.
Ad blockers are used by some 25% of internet users in 2019. In real terms, this means that 25% of internet advertising that uses trackers will not reach their intended audience. (Itâs quite a bit more complicated than that, but the point is that somehow the word got out that people were being tracked and it was those pesky Ads doing all the tracking - enter Adblocking and so an industry was born and an âarms raceâ ensued.)
The peak of the internet searching for the term âAd blockerâ was September 2015.
Me - I call it âtracker blockingâ. There are sites that allow advertising and do not track. Ad blockers donât work there - because there is no tracking to be blocked.
But there is no escape that at one point people were increasingly aware of ad blocking - what it was doing and most importantly - what it was doing to them. They got interested. And then it all fell away.
Thatâs the mistake - we need to keep piling on. Keep reminding people what is going on.
ad blockers ad tracking Data archive.pf.businessAIDA is a marketing model that is well over 100 years old. It has gone through countless iterations, twists and turns. It has been cast out - only to reappear with different words. More stages. Less stages. The âYoung Turksâ who run todayâs corporate marketing department will be using some version of the AIDA model. It is a simple, timeless truth that goes something like this:
For a product, service or idea to gain traction with an individual, that person needs to be attracted in a way that Attention is garnered. Once you have that attention, the person needs to become sufficiently Interested to learn more. To educate themselves. With that education, the person should then develop a Desire to adopt the service, product or thinking so that the Action of purchase of âadoption of ideaâ can be completed.
Thereâs more. While it takes two to tango, it takes an army to change thinking, because the opposition to established ideas, general knowledge and âplain common senseâ is hard. But important and necessary.
NO need to start a discussion here on civil rights. Is there?
Michael Porter published âCompetitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitorsâ in 1980 and introduced the world to The Five Forces Model
Itâs a longer discussion, and maybe not immediately obvious - but we can apply this thinking, with the AIDA model, to build a solid series of campaigns and programs to start to change the dialogue and remind everyone that
Technology is a tool for people to use - not be used against them.
Newsletter archive.pf.businessIf you are old enough, you will remember that the French Government blew up a boat belonging to Greenpeace in the Auckland harbor, New Zealand. (If you arenât old enough - trust me - this is not a movie - this is history.) That was 35 years ago - 14 years after Greenpeace was founded to protest the detonation of a nuclear bomb. Since the early 90s Greenpeace has had a broader goal that puts Climate Change front and centre. They are but one organization fighting that particular battle.
It took until 2016 for The Paris Agreement to come together and really is only the worldâs united effort to start to fight climate change. The only countries recognized as âsignificant emittersâ that have not signed are Iran and Turkey.
Anyway - must be all going smoothly. Right?
Captain Peter Wilcox was the skipper and onboard the Rainbow Warrior in 1985. He still is the skipper of Rainbow Warrior (the third).
âIâm scared that we have lost the battle against climate change. But this stuff gets me up in the morningâŠ..I say weâre losing, does that mean Iâm gonna stop? No. Absolutely not. Iâll go down fighting. Weâre not winning, weâre not succeeding. Global warming is getting worse, and worse, and worse and we havenât even started to change the way we live on the planetâ.
Captain Peter Wilcox
If you feel helpless - imagine how Peter feels.
If I stop using plastic bags, recycle and am I âcarbon neutralâ? What good is that in the fight against climate change? What can a single person do? I donât know ⊠but donât tell the mosquito in a tent that it is ineffective.
Moreover, The United States of America has pulled out of the Paris Agreement.
Meanwhile, climate activist Greta Thunberg has risen from relative obscurity to Time Person of the Year and nominated for the Nobel Peace prize in less than 18 months, all the while being made fun of by bullies like Donald Trump and Steve Mnuchin.
âFirst they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you winâ
I think we are around stage two/three on âclimateâ.
Newsletter archive.pf.businessFrom time to time, my newsletter gets a little TOO long and then I cut and move some of the more self-contained chunks to here, so that people can read the newsletter and if interested can jump to here for more detail. This is one of those chunks.
archive.pf.businessâDoes there, I wonder, exist a being who has read all, or approximately all, that the person of average culture is supposed to have read, and that not to have read is a social sin? If such a being does exist, surely he is an old, a very old man, who has read steadily that which he ought to have read sixteen hours a day, from early infancy. ⊠My leisure has been moderate, my desire strong and steady, my taste in selection certainly above average, and yet in ten years I seem scarcely to have made an impression upon the intolerable multitude in volumes which âeveryone is supposed to have read.â
Arnold Bennett, Journal, Oct. 15, 1896
if itâs not a job
Over here I share a lot of Gaping Voidâs work. Hugh Macleod more often than not nails it. But this one needed a comment.
Boom! Thatâs the way it works, for anyone in the innovation or creative business. History decides what is âartâ, history decides what is âimportantâ âŠ
Meanwhile, youâre just doing your job, youâre just showing up, trying to be a pro, youâre just trying to be a grownup, youâre just trying to get paid.
Hugh Mcleod - Gaping Void
Whilst I donât disagree that âhistoryâ decides what is important - Hugh of all people knows that âhistoryâ is not neutral. An example would be that âHistoryâ for the longest time did not recognize art that came from (say) Africa, because we âsuperiorâ Westerners were writing off thousands and thousands of years of âartâ - because it didnât fit into our Western sensibilities and so classified the art into Natural History Museums.
But thereâs more.
I reject the idea that just because you arenât ârecognized as an artistâ then you are not an artist. That is just wrong.
During his Blue period, Picasso wasnât recognized, was destitute and nobody was buying his paintings. Was he not an artist until he was âdiscoveredâ ⊠sounds a bit like the âsuperiority geneâ is kicking in again.
Sorry Hugh - wrong!
gaping void guest post Work archive.pf.businessBuying Power
Hereâs a snippet from a long-form interview of Yvon Chouinard in Fast Company.
Yvon Chouinard
Question : In the past, you consulted with folks at large companies, such as Walmart, and came away not so convinced of their actual ability to pursue sustainability. If weâre looking to create a better version of capitalism, what do you think should be done with publicly traded companies?
Youâve got to reinvent capitalism altogether. It leads to a whole bunch of poor people and a few extremely rich people. Ultimately, capitalism is going to lose its customers. There wonât be anybody to buy the product because everybody is going to be so poor. The whole thing is going to crash before the next election, probably. Weâre going to get another huge recession, and everybodyâs going to lose out on their stocks. There we go again. Itâs a system thatâs got to change. The whole stock thing is dependent on growth. Look at Amazon. Amazon doesnât make a profit. They donât pay any taxes. Nothing. But theyâre growing like crazy. Itâs all growth, growth, growthâand thatâs whatâs destroying the planet. Iâm dealing with that myself. Weâre a billion-dollar company, over a billion, and I donât want a billion-dollar company. The day they announced it to me, I hung my head and said, âOh God, I knew it would come to this.â Iâm trying to figure out how to make Patagonia act like a small company again.â
âThere wonât be anybody to buy the product because everybody is going to be so poor.â As we have it here at People First âŠ.